Evaluation of the potentials of Selected Agricultural Wastes and Crop Residues for Ruminant Feeding in Nigeria Using In Vitro Gas Production Method

  • Akinfemi, A.
  • Komolafe, P. L.
  • Bankole, J. N.
  • Okolie, L. I.
Keywords: Agricultural residues, Nutritional composition, Fermentation characteristics, In vitro gas production, Ruminant nutrition

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the nutritional composition, in vitro gas production, fermentation parameters, and microbial fermentation characteristics of selected agricultural residues, including potato peels, sorghum husk, maize husk, maize stover, groundnut husk, melon husk, beans husk, maize cob, groundnut haulms, and plantain peels. There were notable differences in crude protein (CP), crude fiber (CF), and other vital components among the residues' chemical composition (g/100g DM). In comparison to other residues, groundnut haulms and plantain peels showed the highest CP (9.14 g/100g DM and 6.31 g/100g DM, respectively), indicating a greater protein concentration. Distinct variations in fermentation capacity were demonstrated by in vitro gas generation; crop residues such as potato peels, plantain peels, and groundnut haulms produced the most gas during a 24-hour period. Less fermentability was shown by the comparatively lower gas production from melon husk and maize cob. The high energy potential of groundnut haulms was highlighted by the high levels of fermentation indices, including methane generation, short-chain fatty acids (SCFA), metabolizable energy (ME), and organic matter digestibility (OMD) (19.00 ml CH₄, 0.85 µm SCFA, 8.42 MJ/kg DM, and 58.72% OMD). Lastly, the fermentation characteristics showed that plantain peels and groundnut haulms had the most effective fermentation, resulting in the lowest lag periods and the maximum overall gas yield. Thus, agricultural residues—in particular, the peels from, plantains and potatoes, and groundnuts haulms—have the potential to improve ruminant nutrition and methane generation, which makes them appropriate for inclusion in sustainable livestock diets.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akpan, N. T., Nyandat, S. R., and Ogunleye, A. O. (2021). Evaluating the feeding potential of sorghum husk as a supplement in ruminant diets. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology. 21(1): 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagst.2020.12.008

Bamikole, M. A., Alamu, O. J. and Ojedapo, L. O. (2017). Maize stover as a viable alternative ruminant feed: A review. International Journal of Livestock Production. 8(3): 29–36. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJLP2017.0369

Blümmel, M., Ogle, B. and Steingass, H. (2003). In vitro gas production techniques for evaluation of feedstuffs: A review. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 104(3): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401 (02)002043

Fashina, O. I., Akinmoladun, O. I. and Adeola, A. A. (2020). Improving the digestibility of agricultural residues for ruminants through supplementation: A review. Animal Production Science. 60(4): 566–573. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN19065

Fievez, V., Babayemi, O. J. and Demeyer, D.2005. Estimation of direct and indirect gas production in syringes: a tool to estimate short chain fatty acid production requiring minimal laboratory facilities. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 123-124: 197-210.

Getachew, G, Blummel, M., Makkar, H.P.S. and Becker, K. 1998. In vitro gas measuring techniques for assessment of nutritional quality of feeds. A review. Animal Feed Science Technology. 72: 261 – 281.

Gupta, S., Kumar, V., Yadav, A., Singh, R. K. and Verma, P. (2022). Fermentation characteristics of crop residues and their potential for bioenergy production. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 148, 111-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111254

Hassan, M. A., Khan, S. H. U., Rahman, M. A., Baig, S. and Ahmad, M. S. (2022). The potential of agricultural residues for bioenergy production: A review. Renewable Energy. 185: 467-478.

Khan, N. R. Bhutto, S. S. Shah, A. N. Soomro, and Ali, M. U. (2023). Effect of different agricultural residues on the in vitro fermentation and methane production. Biomass and Bioenergy. 118: 105634.

Liu, X., and Wei, W. (2024). Digestibility of sorghum husk and other lignocellulosic residues for livestock. Feedstuffs. 78(4): 22-31.

Liu, Z., Y. J. Liu, W. L. Zhang, and Liu, J. R. (2022). Effects of dietary fiber from crop residues on the rumen fermentation and methane production in dairy cattle. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 278: 115180.

Makkar, H. P. S. (2019). Methods for assessing the nutritional value of animal feeds: A review. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 254: 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.03.014

Makkar, H. P. S. (2022). Enhancing the digestibility of agricultural residues through pre-treatment methods. Livestock Science. 246: 104-631.

Makkar, H. P. S., Gupta, A. K., Singh, B. and Ahuja, P. (2022). Enhancing the digestibility of agricultural residues through pre-treatment methods. Livestock Science. 246: 104-631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104631

Makkar, H. P. S., Puniya, K. S., Bhatia, A. P. and Thakur, V. R. (2022). Enhancing the digestibility of agricultural residues through pre-treatment methods. Livestock Science. 246: 104631.

Menke, K and Steingass, H. (1988). Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Anim. Res. Dev. 28: 7 – 55

Niranjan, R., Loka, N. N., Rath, S. S., and Pal, A. (2023). Biological treatment of agricultural residues for improved bioenergy production. Biotechnology Advances. 61: 107 - 942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2023.107942
Odoemelam, S. A. (2016). Utilization of crop residues in Nigeria for livestock feeding: A review. Journal of Animal Production Advances. 6(2): 21–31. https://doi.org/10.3923/japa.2016.21.31

Qrskov, E.R and McDonald , I. (1979).The estimation of protein degradability in rumen from incubation measurements according to rate of passage. Journal of Agricultural Science. Camb. 92: 449 – 503.

Patel, M., Soni, S. K., Desai, M. P., and Yadav, R. K. (2023). The effect of enzymatic treatments on in-vitro gas production from maize stover. Bioresource Technology Reports. 18: 100-950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2023.100950

SAS (2002). User’s guide: Statistic, version 9.1.SAS Institute, Cary,Inc, Cary, NC, USA

Soto, I. A., Paredes, C. M., Valenzuela, C., and Diaz, M. A. (2023). In-vitro digestibility and gas production of potato peel waste. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 284: 115007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2023.115007

Van Soest P.J., Robertson J.B and Lewis B.A. (199).Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science. 74: 3583-3597.

Wang, C., Li, Y. and Zhang, X. (2023). Influence of fiber and ash content on the fermentation and digestibility of maize residues: Implications for ruminant feed. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 289: 115-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2023.115146

Wang, C., Zhang, J., Li, Y., and Zhang, X. (2021). In-vitro evaluation of fermentation characteristics and nutritional value of agricultural residues for ruminants. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 275: 114-913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2021.114913

Zhou, Jian, L. Y. Huang, R. L. Yu, and X. W. Chen. (2022). Biochemical composition and in-vitro digestibility of crop residues for livestock feeding. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 281: 115-153.

Zhou, X., Liu, X., and Zhang, X. (2022). Impact of fiber content on the fermentation characteristics and gas production of crop residues: A comparison of maize cob and sorghum husk. Bioresource Technology. 343: 126-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126116
Published
2025-07-20
How to Cite
Akinfemi, A., Komolafe, P. L., Bankole, J. N., & Okolie, L. I. (2025). Evaluation of the potentials of Selected Agricultural Wastes and Crop Residues for Ruminant Feeding in Nigeria Using In Vitro Gas Production Method. Nigerian Journal of Animal Science and Technology (NJAST), 8(1), 90 - 103. Retrieved from http://njast.com.ng/index.php/home/article/view/411