Assessment of Grazing Behaviour on Milk Production of Friesian x Bunaji Dairy Cows
This study was carried out with the aim of understanding the milk production of Friesian X Bunaji cow, their behaviour with regards to grazing time shared with other activities such as walking and standing by means of visual observation. A total of twenty (20) healthy dairy cows comprising of 50:50 Friesian X Bunaji crosses (10 cows) and 75:25 Friesian x Bunaji crosses (10 cows) were used for the study. These crosses were in their second parity. Data were collected for grazing time, walking and standing time, and milk yields. The results obtained showed significant (p˂0.05) differences between the two genotypes in the time spent for grazing and milk yield. Positive phenotypic correlations were obtained and ranged from 0.50 – 0.79 while significant but negative correlation (rp = -0.84) was obtained for walking against grazing. Therefore, it can be concluded that the grazing time be increased for the animals and selection on high milk yielding animals be done using those positively correlated traits as indicators.
Bareille, N., Beaudeau, F., Billon, S., Robert, A. and Faverdin, P. (2003). Effects of health disorders on feed intake and milk production in dairy cows. Livestock Production and Science 83: 53–62.
Bikker, J.P., van Laar, H., Rump, P., Doorenbos, J., van Meurs, K., Griffioen, G.M. and Dijkstra, J. (2014). Technical note: Evaluation of an ear-attached movement sensor to record cow feeding behavior and activity. Journal of Dairy Science 97(5): 2974 - 2979.
Bowman, G.R., Beauchemin, K.A. and Shelford, J.A. (2003). Fibrolytic enzymes and parity effects on feeding behavior, salivation and ruminal pH of lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 86: 565-575.
Cammack, K.M., Leymaster, K.A., Jenkins, T.G. and Nielsen, M.K. (2005). Estimates of genetic parameters for feed intake, feeding behavior, and daily gain in composite Ram Lambs. Journal of Animal Science 83:777– 785.
Charlton, G.L. and Rutter, S.M. (2017). The behaviour of housed dairy cattle with and without pasture access: A review. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 192: 2-9.
DeVries, T.J., Von Keyserlink, M.A.G., Weary, D.M. and Beauchemin, K.A. (2003). Measuring the feeding behavior of lactating dairy cows in early to peak lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 86: 3354-3361.
Dillon, P., Roche, J., Shalloo, L. and Horan, B. (2005). Optimizing financial return from grazing in temperate pastures. In Proceedings of a satellite workshop of the XXth international grassland congress. (Edited by J.J Murphy). Pages 131-147.
Duncan, D.B. (1955). Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics 11: 1 – 42.
EFSA. (2009.) Scientific report of EFSA prepared by the Animal Health and Animal Welfare Unit on the effects of farming systems on dairy cow welfare and disease. Annex EFSA Journal 1143:1–284.
Egger-Danner, C., Cole, J.B., Pryce, J.E., Gengler, N., Hesingstad, B., Bradley, A. and Stock, K.F. (2015). Invited review: Over view of new traits and phenotypic strategy in dairy cattle with a focus on functional traits. Animal 9(2): 191 – 207.
Fericean, M.L., Palicica, R. and Rada, O. (2010). The behavior of calves. Research Journal of Agricultural Science 42(2): 248254.
Hancock, J. (1950). Studies in monozygotic cattle twins IV. Uniformity trails: Grazing behaviour
Hodgson, J. (1982). Ingestive behavior. In: Leaver J.D. (Ed.), Intake handbook, London, UK, Pages 113–138.
Kolver, E. and Muller, L. (1998). Performance and nutrient intake of high producing Holstein cows consuming pasture or a total mixed ration. Journal of Dairy Science 81(5): 14031411.
Labroue, F., Guéblez, R. and Sellier, P. (1997). Genetic parameters of feeding behaviour and performance traits in group-housed Large White and French Landrace growing pigs. BioMed 29(5): 451-468. HAL 00894180.
Nkrumah, J.D., Crews, Jr. D.H., Basarab, J.A., Price, M.A., Okine, E.K., Wang, Z., Li, C. and Moore, S.S. (2007). Genetic and phenotypic relationships of feeding behavior and temperament with performance, feed efficiency, ultrasound, and carcass merit of beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 85: 2382–2390.
Ovimaps, (2019). Ovi-location map: ovi earth imaginary.
Palicica, R. and Coman, I. (2007). “Etologie” Ed. OrizonturiUniversitare, Timişoara, Pges 108-113.
SAS, (2002). Statistical Analysis System, Computer software, Version 9: Statistical SAS Institute Inc. Cary, Northern Carolina 27513, USA.
Schutz, M.M. and Pajor, E.A. (2001). Genetic control of dairy cattle behaviour. Journal of Dairy Science 83(E. Supplementary): E31E38. Symposium: A tribute to A.E. Freeman.
Tolkamp, B.J., Allcroft, D.J., Austin, E.J., Nielsen, B.L. and Kyriazakis, I. (1998). Satiety splits feeding behavior into bouts. Journal of Theoretical Biology 194: 235-350.
Tolkamp, B.J., Schweitzer, D.P.N. and Kyriazakis, I. (2000). The biologically relevant unit for the analysis of short-term feeding behavior of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 83: 2057-2068.
Weinrich, R., Kühl, S., Zühlsdorf, A. and Spiller, A. (2014). Consumer attitudes in Germany towards different dairy housing systems and their implications for the marketing of pasture raised milk. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 17(4): 205-222.
Werner, J.A., Lesoa, L., Umstatterd, C., Niederhausere, J., Kennedya, E., Geoghegana, A., Shallooa, L., Schick, M. and O’Brien, B. (2017). Evaluation of the Rumi watch system for measuring grazing behaviour of cows. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 1-9.
Werner, J.A. (2018). Measuring grazing behaviour of dairy cows: Validation of sensor technologies and assessing application potential in intensive pasture-based milk production systems. Dissertation submitted in fulfilment of the regulations to acquire the doctorate degree in Agricultural Sciences in the Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Hohenheim, Page 1 – 138.